Difference between revisions of "Game Judi Sbobet88 Casino Login di Android"
m |
m |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | sexuality, rather than boosting healthy body toleration.50<br />36. Entire nudity is antithetic to the complex semi-pornography of the fashion industry.<br />Julian Robinson observes, "modesty is so intertwined with sexual desire and also the requirement for sexual show--<br />fighting but at precisely the same time re-kindling this desire--that a self-perpetuating process is inevitably set in motion. In<br />fact modesty can never actually achieve its ultimate end except through its disappearance.<br />modesty there are to be found many essential elements of the sexual urge itself." 51<br />37. Clothes regularly focuses attention on the genitals and sexual arousal, rather than away from them. 52<br />At various times in Western history distinct parts of female human body have been eroticized: bellies and<br />thighs in the Renaissance; buttocks, breasts, and thighs by the late 1800s (and relatively diminutive waistlines and<br />Abdomens). Knickers design has historically emphasized these erogenous body parts: corsets in the 1800s deemphasized<br />the midriff and accentuated the breasts--using materials including whalebone and steel; the crinoline in<br />the mid 1800s stressed the midsection; and the bustle, appearing in 1868, emphasized the buttocks.53 Bathing suit<br />E.B. Hurlock writes: "When primitive folks are unaccustomed to wearing clothes, putting it on for the<br />first time does not decrease their immorality, as the women of missionary societies think it'll. It's merely the<br />opposite effect. It brings attention to the human body particularly for all those parts of it which are covered for the first time." 54<br />Rob Boyte notes wryly that "textile people, when they do strip in front of others, usually do it for passion, and find<br />the bikini pattern tan lines attractive. This is reminiscent of the scarification practiced by primitive societies, and<br />Reveals how clothing patterns become a fetish of the body." 55 Havelock Ellis writes: "If the conquest of sexual<br />Want were the first and last factor of life it would be more reasonable to prohibit clothes than to forbid<br />nakedness." 56<br />38. The fashion industry rides on the sex appeal of garments.<br />Peter Fryer writes: "The changes in women's fashions are basically determined by the demand to keep<br />men's sexual attraction, and thus to transfer the main zone of sensual display once a given element of the body has<br /><br /><br />been saturated with attractive power to the stage of satiation. . . . Each new trend seeks to arouse interest in a new<br />erogenous zone to replace the zone which, for the time being, is played out." 57<br />39. Differences of clothes between the genders focus attention on sex differences.58<br />Shrink J.C. [https://s3.amazonaws.com/a-naturist/nude-beach-pussies.html boynudism] writes: "There seems to be (notably in modern life) no essential element in the<br />nature, habits, or functions of the two genders that would necessitate a dramatic difference of costume--other than the<br />Want to accentuate gender differences themselves; an accentuation that predominantly serves the end of more easily and<br />frequently arousing sexual passion." 59<br />40. Many psychologists think that clothes may originally have developed, in part, as a way of<br />focusing sexual focus.60<br />41. [https://s3.amazonaws.com/a-naturist/family-nudist-pics.html https://s3.amazonaws.com/a-naturist/family-nudist-pics.html] is more sexually arousing (in generally unhealthy ways) than complete nudity.<br />Anne Hollander writes: "The more significant garments is, the more meaning attaches to its lack and the<br />more knowledge is created about any relation between both states." 61 Elizabeth B. Hurlock notes that "it is<br />unquestionably a well known fact that recognizable things arouse no fascination, while concealment lends enchantment and<br />stimulates curiosity . . . a cloaked body with only enough covering to indicate the outline, is far more alluring than a<br />Absolutely naked body." 62 And Lee Baxandall observes, "the 'nearly'-nude beaches, where bikinis and thongs are<br />paraded, are more sexually titillating than a clothes-optional resort or beach. What exactly is natural is more fulfilling,<br />63<br />42. Modesty--particularly demanded modesty--just adds to sexual attraction and desire.64<br />Reena Glazer writes:<br />Since they're freely inaccessible; society further eroticizes the female breast by labeling it black to expose.<br />This element of the forbidden only perpetuates the extreme male reaction female exposure supposedly<br />inspires." 65<br />43. Topfree66 inequality (requiring women, but not men, to wear tops) produces an unhealthy obsession<br />44. The identification of breasts as sexual objects in our culture has caused the discouragement of breastfeeding,<br />the encouragement of unnecessary cosmetic surgery for breast augmentation, and avoidance of needed<br />breast examinations by girls.<br /> |
Revision as of 16:55, 4 April 2020
sexuality, rather than boosting healthy body toleration.50
36. Entire nudity is antithetic to the complex semi-pornography of the fashion industry.
Julian Robinson observes, "modesty is so intertwined with sexual desire and also the requirement for sexual show--
fighting but at precisely the same time re-kindling this desire--that a self-perpetuating process is inevitably set in motion. In
fact modesty can never actually achieve its ultimate end except through its disappearance.
modesty there are to be found many essential elements of the sexual urge itself." 51
37. Clothes regularly focuses attention on the genitals and sexual arousal, rather than away from them. 52
At various times in Western history distinct parts of female human body have been eroticized: bellies and
thighs in the Renaissance; buttocks, breasts, and thighs by the late 1800s (and relatively diminutive waistlines and
Abdomens). Knickers design has historically emphasized these erogenous body parts: corsets in the 1800s deemphasized
the midriff and accentuated the breasts--using materials including whalebone and steel; the crinoline in
the mid 1800s stressed the midsection; and the bustle, appearing in 1868, emphasized the buttocks.53 Bathing suit
E.B. Hurlock writes: "When primitive folks are unaccustomed to wearing clothes, putting it on for the
first time does not decrease their immorality, as the women of missionary societies think it'll. It's merely the
opposite effect. It brings attention to the human body particularly for all those parts of it which are covered for the first time." 54
Rob Boyte notes wryly that "textile people, when they do strip in front of others, usually do it for passion, and find
the bikini pattern tan lines attractive. This is reminiscent of the scarification practiced by primitive societies, and
Reveals how clothing patterns become a fetish of the body." 55 Havelock Ellis writes: "If the conquest of sexual
Want were the first and last factor of life it would be more reasonable to prohibit clothes than to forbid
nakedness." 56
38. The fashion industry rides on the sex appeal of garments.
Peter Fryer writes: "The changes in women's fashions are basically determined by the demand to keep
men's sexual attraction, and thus to transfer the main zone of sensual display once a given element of the body has
been saturated with attractive power to the stage of satiation. . . . Each new trend seeks to arouse interest in a new
erogenous zone to replace the zone which, for the time being, is played out." 57
39. Differences of clothes between the genders focus attention on sex differences.58
Shrink J.C. boynudism writes: "There seems to be (notably in modern life) no essential element in the
nature, habits, or functions of the two genders that would necessitate a dramatic difference of costume--other than the
Want to accentuate gender differences themselves; an accentuation that predominantly serves the end of more easily and
frequently arousing sexual passion." 59
40. Many psychologists think that clothes may originally have developed, in part, as a way of
focusing sexual focus.60
41. https://s3.amazonaws.com/a-naturist/family-nudist-pics.html is more sexually arousing (in generally unhealthy ways) than complete nudity.
Anne Hollander writes: "The more significant garments is, the more meaning attaches to its lack and the
more knowledge is created about any relation between both states." 61 Elizabeth B. Hurlock notes that "it is
unquestionably a well known fact that recognizable things arouse no fascination, while concealment lends enchantment and
stimulates curiosity . . . a cloaked body with only enough covering to indicate the outline, is far more alluring than a
Absolutely naked body." 62 And Lee Baxandall observes, "the 'nearly'-nude beaches, where bikinis and thongs are
paraded, are more sexually titillating than a clothes-optional resort or beach. What exactly is natural is more fulfilling,
63
42. Modesty--particularly demanded modesty--just adds to sexual attraction and desire.64
Reena Glazer writes:
Since they're freely inaccessible; society further eroticizes the female breast by labeling it black to expose.
This element of the forbidden only perpetuates the extreme male reaction female exposure supposedly
inspires." 65
43. Topfree66 inequality (requiring women, but not men, to wear tops) produces an unhealthy obsession
44. The identification of breasts as sexual objects in our culture has caused the discouragement of breastfeeding,
the encouragement of unnecessary cosmetic surgery for breast augmentation, and avoidance of needed
breast examinations by girls.