Fast file site

Webhard
Compared to the following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially in the case of videos, the next cloud needs to be downloaded all together, while streaming. Merely to stream! I need to install another app again. Cloud alone isn't enough to stream.

Faster than the next cloud. About 20%.

When you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks less than the next cloud (but breaking itself is already a problem).

Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it is possible to write. However, the problem is that the document format is a bizarre format, such as for example .ndoc, that makes it extremely incompatible.

File sharing through the URL (but that is as far as another cloud is concerned).

Webhard

It includes a smaller capacity when compared to next cloud.

Compared to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.

Compared to the next cloud, it is very disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming can be done only for several selected sound sources. The next cloud only needs to be in a folder.

You have to share a URL so you can't share music files or videos.

According to the report, you will find a saying that N drive looks like a local drive when installed, but only it comes out like a local drive, which is no different from the folder synchronization setting. It's even worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks in it. It's far better to just tidy up the synchronization folder.***

It is extremely specialized in playing music. In particular, it is the only cloud that may play sound sources within an environment much like MP3 players we are familiar with. Although each song has some buffering, it appears to play around 192kpbs continuously, let's assume that communication is in good condition in a 3G environment. p2p순위 Needless to say, in reality, it's often cut off at that point)

It has a large capacity. This is a significant advantage when considering domestic cloud services all together, which have poor quality of media access in cloud services.

You can substitute the end drive above. In particular, in case a picture is contained in a document, it is rarely opened properly.

Streaming songs often cuts off (however, not often) due to communication issues with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it's about once every two hours. And if you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a place where the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets cut off more often. So when it's in that state, you should find the path of the folder where the song was playing and play it again.

The only way to talk about is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are for sale to file viewing. Except for those points, there is nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level.

Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)

Google Drive

It exerts tremendous power in writing documents. In particular, even without an office program, Google Drive can cover it to some extent. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, nearly every simple document is OK.

It is beneficial to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By setting up only offline views, the files you work on can continue being reflected in the cloud in real time. It is a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.

It is easy to connect with other Google services such as for example Gmail.

If you don't upload documents right to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capacity of the file will not take into account cloud storage (what can you mean, if you just utilize the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite).

Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. You can flip through photos and videos can be played right away. However, the loading time appears to take a little longer than the dropbox. I feel it), nonetheless it doesn't bother me.

There are probably the most apps which can be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the web environment without installing programs on the computer. It's a bit of a problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it is the best in the desktop environment.

Upload a little pdf file and change it out to Google Docs format. It can then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.

There is absolutely no bandwidth restriction in name. There's a testimony that it is a block after a lot of writing, but it isn't stipulated by company policy.

If you use Google Docs web app, you can save documents indefinitely, but in the event that you save them indefinitely, it is the same as when you lose your Internet connection, you are going to sink and use MS word, right?)

Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files utilizing a variety of programs, nonetheless it is still crude in comparison to office programs used on computers.Is it obvious?)


Dropbox

It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Could be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services require a specific amount of buffering time for each photo). However, in the event that you wait a bit for the dropbox, the photos in a single folder are loaded entirely. While considering Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling is possible without the blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, you can freely specify until the start of playback. It is the best in the world with regards to media reading.

There are various method of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the company level, etc.



The speed is relatively good. It's a lot faster compared to the Box and doesn't bother with Google Drive.

The file capacity limit which can be uploaded from a free account may be the largest. 300MB.

The bandwidth of the free account is larger than that of the Box. It is updated by 20GB each day. It's practically infinite unless you're going to share large files.

The starting capacity may be the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.

Price compared to capacity may be the priciest cloud service. Dirty bastards...

There exists a saying that changes in documents can't be reflected instantly when working on documents.

Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.

The dropbox itself cannot be documented.

There are probably the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. In order to work on a document, you can choose the interface you want through the app drive and focus on it leisurely.

In the case of document files, simple document inquiry is a convenient axis because previews are provided. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if there are multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents may also be flipped on the file or file, as can be seen in the photo file.

File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a web page to talk about data conveniently with little usage of the net page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB monthly, which is quite small.

Slow. Not paid people.

Media access is very disadvantageous. It's even worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's better to just do it on a computer than listen to it for a test.

The uploadable file capacity limit may be the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.

In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.

Unless you install Boxeditor, the documentation will undoubtedly be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it is better than Dropbox, but it's significantly less than Google Drive).

It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is currently quite convenient. Especially photo files. However the pace is still a little slow.***

Skydrive

The writing function is quite powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's is the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there are also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.

The basic capacity is quite good. 7GB. Well, it's not that strong a difference.

It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps may be the most backward cloud service ever.